Archive for the ‘Direct Mail’ Category

The Influence of Print, Digital and Social In the Purchase Decision

Friday, July 15th, 2011

The Influence of Print, Digital and Social In the Purchase Decision

July 2011 — Shopper Sciences, IPG Mediabrands’ research and shopper marketing consultancy, conducted a national study commissioned by Google to explore how the changing world of media is influencing shoppers’ move from undecided to decided as they move along the path to purchase.

Conducted in April 2011 among 5,000 U.S. shoppers across 12 diverse shopping categories, from groceries to cars to financial products, the research analyzed the role of more than 50 different media sources—including traditional advertising, internet search and display, mobile, online social and retail store channels.

The research divided potential forms of influence into three areas:

“Stimulus” — marketing efforts that spark the consumer’s awareness and familiarity with a product or service;

The “Zero Moment of Truth” — research and fact finding activities about a product or service directly undertaken by consumers;

The “Final Moment of Truth” — the moment at the shelf, before purchase, in the retail store.

According to the study, today’s shoppers are digging up more information, from more sources, before they buy.  The survey reveals that the average shopper uses 10.4 sources of information to make a decision in 2011, up from 5.3 sources in 2010.  Those 10.4 sources range from TV commercials and magazine articles, to recommendations from friends and family, to websites, ratings and blogs online.

Survey participants were asked, “When you were considering purchasing [PRODUCT] what sources of information did you seek out to help with your decision?”

The top marketing sources delivered by the three forms of influence mentioned above:

N=5,003  Source: Google/Shopper Sciences, Zero Moment of Truth Macro Study, April 2011.

Analysis shows that 82% of 18-34 year olds cited “stimulus” mediums on the path to purchase, roughly 5% higher than 35-49 year olds (77%), and 10% higher than 50-plus year olds (72%).

 

N=5,003  Source: Google/Shopper Sciences, Zero Moment of Truth Macro Study, April 2011.

Nine out of 10 (91%) 18-34 year olds turned to research and fact finding (“Zero Moment of Truth”) mediums on the path to purchase, compared to 85% of 35-49 year olds, and 79% of 50-plus year olds.

N=5,003  Source: Google/Shopper Sciences, Zero Moment of Truth Macro Study, April 2011.

The study data showed that 81% of 18-34 year olds relied on “at the shelf” (Final Moment of Truth) mediums before purchase, compared to three-quarters of 35-49 year olds and 50-plus year olds.

“Pre-shopping before buying has become a huge, huge part of customer behavior.  In the past, it was pretty much confined to big-ticket items like cars, or expensive electronics or homes.  Now people engage in discovery before shopping on very small things.  It’s crossed all categories of shopping behavior. It’s just the way people buy today,” Bob Thacker, Gravitytank Strategic Advisor and former CMO of OfficeMax is quoted as saying.

Source:  Google, ZMOT: Winning the Zero Moment of Truth by Jim Lecinski, accessed July 6, 2011.

via Print in the Mix: Fast Fact – The Influence of Print, Digital and Social In the Purchase Decision.

Websites supported by catalogs generate 163% more revenue than sites that aren’t.

Tuesday, July 12th, 2011

Surprise—direct mail is alive and well.

With the success and increasing use of electronic and online media, there have been rumors of the impending death of direct mail.

So it may surprise you to hear that direct mail is continuing to prove itself as a means for reaching customers and prospects, especially as part of an integrated multichannel strategy.

Direct mail users, including leading e-tailers, point out that not all customers respond the same way to communications and everyone has his or her preferred way to get information. They refer to growing evidence that direct mail is a very effective way to drive people to Web-based marketing.

One study: Websites supported by catalogs generate 163% more revenue than sites that aren’t.

In fact, Deliver magazine says direct mail catalogs are more relevant than ever, citing a Key Catalog/Multichannel Issues Survey conducted by Vovici EFM4 in which 96 percent of respondents agreed that a printed catalog generated online sales. More than 60 percent said catalogs influenced half or more of their online sales, and better than half saw a 20 to 50 percent increase in online sales immediately after a catalog drop.

Research commissioned by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS)5 showed that consumers receiving direct mail and catalogs were more likely to buy online than those who received nothing through the mail, and those shoppers tended to buy and spend more—the study’s results indicated that websites supported by catalogs generated 163 percent more revenue than sites that weren’t.

Zappos.com, one of the world’s leading e-tailers, would concur. A few years ago this popular Web-based seller of shoes and accessories began publishing a glossy catalog, Zappos Life, and were pleasantly surprised to find that the average catalog order amount was double that of the typical online transaction.

Print catalogs are now a highly productive sales channel for leading e-tailer Zappos.

Since that time, Zappos has been steadily expanding the print catalog program with more drops each year and focusing on specific segments such as fashion, skate/surf, running and a number of other possibilities that include bridal, western and housewares.

A USPS study in the financial services industry6 further bolstered the view that there’s a tie between direct mail and Web-based success. When compared with consumers who received only online communications, those receiving both direct mail and online messaging made more than 70 percent more visits to the site; tended to view more pages and spend more time there; were 31 percent more likely to visit the site in the future and were 34 percent more inclined to recommend the site to friends and family.

4. David J. Mastervich, Deliver Magazine, Vol. 5, Issue 5 (10/09)

5. David J. Mastervich, Deliver Magazine, Vol. 5, Issue 5 (10/09)

6. U.S. Postal Service, “Why Financial Web Sites Should Invest in Mail,” 2007

via But wait—surprise—direct mail is alive and well. – Ed #14 Getting Personal – Ed Lives Here.

The End of Demographics: How Marketers Are Going Deeper With Personal Data

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

I found this great article this morning, well worth the read:

From Mashable:

Marketers have built a temple that needs to be torn down. Demographics have defined the target consumer for more than half a century — poorly. Now, with emerging interest graphs from social networks, behavioral data from search outlets and lifecycle forecasting, we have much better ways of targeting potential customers.

The rise of mass-produced consumer goods also brought the rise of mass-market advertising. In the 1950s and 1960s, the goal of television was to aggregate the most possible eyeballs for advertisers. In order to convince consumers that an advertising message was relevant to them, consumers had to buy the idea that they were just like everyone else.

Marketers created that buy-in by bucketing people into generations. When you lump 78 million people into one group called “Baby Boomers,” it’s much easier to sell them stuff, especially when consumers accepted their generational classification.

But now, that entire system has broken down. The year that someone was born will not tell you how likely he is to buy your product.

Fragmentation is now the norm because the pace of change is accelerating. Generations have been getting smaller because there are fewer unifying characteristics of young people today than ever before:

With the recent rise of the social web, people self-select into groups so small, so fragmented, and so temporal, that no overarching top-down approach could be successful at driving marketing performance.

Marketers have responded by adding more demographic information to the mix, but even that is a losing battle. I worked with one client who was introducing a technology product, and had identified a target market of “connected consumers.” Connected consumers were 34-55, had a household income over $120k, and read technology publications regularly. This target market represented 14 million consumers.

They were targeting 14 million consumers to sell 50,000 units — that means they were hoping for 3.5 sales for every 1,000 people with whom they connected through their marketing.

What if, instead, you could get 500 sales from every 1,000 people you marketed to?

It’s possible through psychographic profiling. Psychographics look at the mental model of the consumer in the context of a customer lifecycle. Amazon.com has long been a leader in this space, through innovations like “recommended products” and “users like me also bought.” Its algorithms have learned to predict its users, and what they are interested in. And now, there are a number of tools that any business can use to leverage psychographics.

Here’s how a psychographic profile might look different from a traditional marketing profile target for a childcare provider:

Psychographics provide much more useful information about users. There are multiple data sources making this possible today. Social profile data, behavioral data and customer lifecycle data can now finally be leveraged to contact people who are ready to buy.


Social Profile Data


Profile data from social networks consist of all the fields users grant permission for brands to use on their behalf. Most things that users track on social networks can be leveraged to create a closer relationship with a customer. Fields like relationship status, alma mater, interests and occupation can all be managed through social profile data management tools.

Social profile data is the critical cornerstone of psychographic insights. The level of nuance and insight provided by social data, when compared to standard demographics, is the difference between performing surgery with a scalpel or a butter knife. Previously unimaginable questions are now routine:

  • Are customers who kayak more likely to buy water shoes than those who canoe?
  • Who is more likely to spend over $100 on an order: Seattle Seahawks fans or Seattle Mariners fans?
  • Are your customers more likely to purchase when they move across the state or across the country?

In addition, companies such as GraphEffect are measuring purchase intent by doing semantic analysis on Facebook status updates. This type of qualitative analysis can move users into specific marketing funnels from their very first online experience with your brand.


Behavioral Data


Retargeting advertising messages is gaining popularity among marketers, but its very success has jeopardized its effectiveness. Ads that follow users around the web have been implemented — usually poorly. Every ad network quickly incorporated the ability to place cookies in users’ browsers, and display specific ads to them any time they visit a site that’s part of their networks.

The next generation of ad targeting will focus more on telling the customer a story over time, based on specific behavior triggers. That means ad networks and clickstream data aggregators will work together to trigger when a customer moves forward in a mental model toward a purchase event.

Site content and product recommendations will also be informed by clickstream analysis. Companies such asRichRelevanceCertonaBaynote and Monetate all offer the ability to personalize information to specific visitors based on their behavior. Leveraging those alongside a payload of social profile data can turbocharge those services from the first moment a new user visits a site.


Customer Lifecycle Data


Social profile data can also be used to predict customer lifecycle. Imagine knowing not only if a customer has children, but the exact ages of those children. In addition, key indicator purchases, like buying diapers for the first time, indicate a customer entering a new lifecycle. Other key indicators, like shipping address changes, first purchases of furniture, or first purchases of substantially higher-value goods can all indicate the start of a new customer mentality and behavior pattern.

These patterns are predictable, so you know the future behavior of high school seniors by looking at the current behavior of college freshmen. By using demographics alone, all high school graduates would be marketed to identically. Using psychographics, we know who is likely to be interested in specific product or content recommendations at a specific time — such as when they actually start their first day of college.

This vision is starting to gain traction among serious marketers. At the 2009 Internet Strategy Forum, Xerox’s VP of Interactive Marketing, Duane Schulz, said that a 1% clickthrough rate was a huge failure — even though it is 10 times the industry average. In his mind, a successful campaign would never waste 99% of its impressions. Using psychographic data, you don’t have to waste any impressions.

We have seen a similar upheaval in marketing before. In the 1960s, marketers who embraced the power of television, broad-based insights into psychology and demographic data created world-class brands and billions of dollars in value. At that time, if you didn’t advertise on TV, you lost. Today’s new tools offer a similar choice: Build a deep understanding of your customer, or risk irrelevance.

Image courtesy of iStockphotoporcorex

Jamie Beckland is a Digital and Social Media Strategist atJanrain where he helps Fortune 1000 companies integrate social media technologies into their websites to improve user acquisition and engagement. He has built online communities since 2004. He tweets as @Beckland.

Direct Mail Savings are in the Finishing

Wednesday, March 16th, 2011

as found on the Digital Nirvana

By Trish Witkowski on March 16th, 2011

Even though the USPS is struggling, and digital and social media are all the rage, direct mail is seeing renewed interest and technological advancement—for good reason. Printed material in the mailbox, done right, is still the preferred and most effective way to reach a customer. The key to whether or not the opportunity is a wasted one comes down to format and technique. I’ll give you an example:

Recently, I was involved in a collaboration with Sappi Fine Paper. I provided content for their highly acclaimed educational publication series The Standard Volume 4: Scoring & Folding (you can obtain a free copy of the publication by clicking here).

To launch the project, we did a seven-city speaking tour, which included myself and world-famous designer Kit Hinrichs, who was responsible for the design of the piece. Sappi sent out a save the date email blast in each city, which received some response. They followed it up with an exotic “Twist Fold” direct mailpiece in a brightly colored envelope, and the RSVPs skyrocketed the day that piece hit mailboxes. Hundreds showed up at each venue for the events. Print can be powerful.

For this instance, the concept was on target, the design was great, the fold was interesting, and the envelope was attention-grabbing. This was a special piece mailed to a targeted audience and they got the response they were looking for. So, is the moral of the story that you have to spend a lot of money, use a funky fold and an envelope that screams to get good results these days? Of course not. The lesson here is that email alone won’t cut it. Print alone may not cut it, either, but good design and smart decisions along the way can save money, while getting you the response that justifies the expenditure.

Here are a few tips:

  • If you want to use an interesting folding style, go for it—but do your research first. Some folds that are generally hand-folded can in many cases be finished by machine if the quantity is high enough. There are specialty binderies that can do this kind of work. On the flip side, if your quantity is low, the expense of hand folding isn’t a very big deal.
  • The Sappi piece finished to a square format, which we all know is more expensive from a mailing perspective, but there are many, many interesting folding configurations that can finish to rectangular formats that fit within USPS aspect ratio. Why spend an extra $.20 per piece if you don’t have to? This tip seems like common sense, but I have samples in my folding collection that miss aspect ratio by 1/8 inch. What a careless and costly mistake.
  • Make sure your list is clean. It sounds obvious, but if your mailing list isn’t current or targeted, then you’re wasting money. The goal should be to spend an appropriate amount of money on a quality piece that is sent to a clean list of targeted customers.
  • For self-mailing pieces, watch fold placement. If the folds are vertical, the lead edge (the edge to the right of the mailing address) must be closed. Other edges must be closed or tabbed. If the fold is on the horizontal, the fold should be below the mailing address. Also, mailing address should always be parallel to the longest dimension. Defy these rules and you can kiss your ROI goodbye to the tune of an additional $.20 per piece non-machinable surcharge.
  • Utilize as much automation as possible. Ask your printer how you can maximize the efficiency of your direct mail projects. Many have invested in inline finishing equipment that can score, perf, slit, glue and fold inline. Any time you can automate the process, you can save money. And automation doesn’t necessarily mean limited creativity, either. There are some very sophisticated computerized folding machines that can blow through gate folds, stepped accordions, and lots of other interesting configurations. If you’re printing digitally, various forms of customization can be very effective and efficient with some advanced planning.
  • Don’t forget about the envelope. A great printed piece can be overlooked in a boring envelope. Consider full color printing, personalization, custom windows or pulls—do something to get attention and motivate the recipient.
  • Spend money to make money. If you’re going to put in the effort and expense to produce and mail a piece, shouldn’t it represent your best efforts? Maybe you saved money with a cheap sheet, a tri-fold format, and a #10 envelope, but if nobody noticed, didn’t you ultimately lose a lot more than you saved?
  • Lastly, don’t get caught up in gimmicks. It can be tempting to go in the other direction and pull out all the stops, but there must be balance. A really cool folding style with a confusing message will just end up in somebody’s “cool idea file” or maybe even their “circular file.” A successful direct mailer involves many components and those components must work together to send the right message and provoke a call to action. For best results, resist the urge to get sidetracked solely on “wow-factor” and focus on the objectives and the quality presentation of your content.

 

 

Direct mail rated as an effective tactic by many B2B organizations

Friday, March 4th, 2011

From Marketing Sherpa, chart of the week:

The vast majority of B2B organizations find direct mail to be either very effective or somewhat effective for their organization. This is likely a result of the various personalization and segmentation capabilities organizations executing this tactic now have, such as personalization for name, location and other data points and segmenting lists based on a number of criteria.
Organizations of all sizes found direct mail to be a very effective tactic. One-quarter of organizations with fewer than 100 employees viewed the use of direct mail in this light; 19% of mid-sized organizations and 21% of large organizations also considered direct mail to be a very effective tactic.

Organizations in the business services sector are the most likely to find direct mail very effective, with 34% of business services organizations assigning this rating. This may be an indication that organizations in the business services sector are also the most efficient in their execution of this tactic.

Only 13% of organizations in the business technology sector find direct mail to be a very effective marketing tactic. Many of these organizations need to communicate complex feature sets and capabilities to their target audience, which may not easily be achieved without causing confusion through a direct mail piece.