Archive for February, 2011

Should You Think Quality or Quantity in B-to-B Lead Gen?

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Saw this post on Chief Business Marketer, and thought it spoke to what a lot of my clients are looking at:

The bottom line in any marketing campaign today is return on investment. That makes it imperative to know what matters more in your lead generation efforts, quality or quantity.

“If you put something out there that gets a lot of respondents, those people aren’t necessarily leads,” notes David Azulay, vice president, client services at The Kern Organization.

Much depends on reaching your prospect the right way, at the right time, in their buying cycle. Sometimes, you need quantity, notes Azulay. For example, a startup ISP he worked with only cared about getting names to fill up the sales funnel. They then scored those names and passed them along to sales reps. In contrast, an established software vendor selling a million-dollar solution with a long sales cycle needs to craft a much more careful campaign that nurtures prospects along the way.

What Offer is Right for You?

Whether you want quality or quantity campaigns determines the types of offers you should make to your prospects, says Azulay.

For example, if you’re looking to get a large number of folks to raise their hand and overcome their reluctance to even talk to a salesperson, offers such as gas or Amazon gift cards perform in today’s thrifty environment. (In flusher times, notes Azulay, leases on flashy cars played well.)

“You need to obtain insight into what they want and ease them into the process, and make them more comfortable with you,” he says.

If you’re looking for quality leads, a good place to start would be offers that give prospects more information about their problem that your business might be able to solve. Take a look at your inventory of information, such as testimonials, webinars and white papers.

“What do you have that can communicate value to prospects?” asks Azulay. “Often, companies don’t know what they have and how to hit prospects with offers at different times in the sales cycle.”

“Don’t make it too complicated or vague—offers that are related to what you sell and are relevant work best,” Azulay notes.

Today, B-to-B marketers need to have offers for several different touches before they ask a customer for a meeting. A first or second touch might involve getting a prospect to offer some information in exchange for a small gift such as a USB drive or the chance to enter a sweepstakes. To get a prospect on the phone, marketers may need to combine a hard and soft offer—say, offer a $100 gift card in exchange for a conversation.

Sales and Marketing Need to Get on the Same Page

The lead generation process is strongest, of course, when sales and marketing work together. But sales and marketing aren’t always aligned, points out Azulay.

“Marketing wants to bring in more leads and hand them off, but sales wants more qualified leads,” he says. “Sales doesn’t want to cultivate leads. Sales reps want to schedule the in-person appointment and close the sale.”

Often, many leads sit in a database and get outdated because sales reps don’t have any relationship with them and don’t have the time to cultivate these fresh names. That means the initiative falls on marketing.

“Marketers spend millions and many sales leads are never followed up on because there is no relationship,” Azulay says. “Maybe 50% get followed up on and maybe half of those get qualified. But, if you cultivated those other 50%, you could create a relationship.

“If you’re not ready to do complex lead nurturing, keep it simple,” he suggests. “Keep it automated and get the message out. If you don’t have an automated nurture system, after the data goes out to sales you don’t know what happened to those leads and why prospects didn’t buy.”

It’s important, though, to remember that regardless of who is making the contact—sales, marketing or other departments, possibly about multiple product lines—customers should only be touched with the most relevant information. “You don’t want to risk them opting out of all communications in frustration.”

Lead Gen and Shrinking Budgets—What to Do?

In the current economy, every B-to-B company is facing a smaller marketing budget. However, the demand generation process needs to keep going, says Azulay. You have to put the investment in or you won’t have any sales.

Companies shouldn’t take the economy as a cue to simply shift all their dollars online, though. “If mail worked for you three years ago, why do you think it won’t work now?” he asks. “I don’t think everyone should be starting from scratch.”

Now is the time to test and look at new lead gen tactics you might not have tried before, such as mobile, he says.

“Also, there are many tactics that we’re not measuring as well as we can, such as click-throughs on splash or thank you pages,” Azulay notes. “We need to look at where we’re missing opportunities to track and test. Monitor where people are looking online and do an inventory of your offers. Try putting a different white paper on your website and see what pulls better—sometimes, it’s that simple.”

Get Someone Else to Sell Your Proposition

Don’t just toot your own horn—get someone else to toot it for you. If you’re trying to reach high-level CTOs, get a respected industry resource, such as a publication or consultancy, to evaluate you. Ask your customers what they think, too.

Source is here.

 

How was it printed? Simple ways to determine the printing method used.

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

I came across this great post the other day, written by Gordon Pritchard, and published on his blog: Quality in Print. I strongly recommend checking it out – he has some great posts.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From Quality in Print:

The proliferation of new printing technologies like commercial production toner and ink jet presses as well as the rapid increase in quality of some traditional systems like flexography, has made it a bit difficult to determine exactly which printing method was used for a given sample. Was it offset or digital ink jet? Flexo or offset?

Here is a guide to help you identify which printing method has been used. The best method is to look very closely with a loupe at the letter forms and then confirm by looking at the halftone dots themselves. Although these images were taken at about 200x to show as much detail as possible, they are not that different than what would be seen by the human eye under a loupe at 10-20x.

Offset lithography

Type edges are sharp and well defined. The ink density is similar across the letter. The paper around the printed ink is usually clear/unprinted. The sharpness and consistent ink density is reflected in the halftone dots. Note that this same sharp appearance occurs if the halftone screen used is FM (the third image) rather than AM (second image).


Gravure

All graphic elements appear halftone screened so the edges of text show a rough halftone appearance. Although presswork color may appear rich, viewed under a loupe, the halftone dots may have a watery appearance. Individual dots may appear to have a hole in their centers.


Flexography

Flexography uses a rubber-like plate that, under pressure, transfers ink to the substrate. This results in type that often appear to be surrounded by a sharp-edged “halo.” The same effect, but in opposite, occurs in the halftone dots which may have dark edges and light centers. Both type and halftone dots usually have very sharp and well defined edges. Note that this dot sharpness also occurs with an FM screen printed with flexo (third image).


Electrophotographic (a.k.a. laser toner, Xerographic)

With electrophotographic systems the image is created by depositing a powder toner. This results in a “sprayed on” appearance. Type edges are soft and there are often specks of wayward toner on what should be unprinted paper. Halftone dots have a similar fuzzy appearance.


Inkjet

Under a loupe, ink jet type has a “blocky” “chunky” edge appearance. This is caused by the low resolution/large droplet size typical of these devices (despite the claims of high dpi). Sometimes there will be the occasional “satellite” ink droplet near the letter (two are shown in the image below). Because of the way the ink is sprayed onto the substrate, halftoned areas appear to be done with an FM screen. However, unlike the FM screening used in offset lithography, there is usually no apparent pattern or organization to the dots.


Engraving

Engraving is typically used for currency/bank note printing, stamps, and sometimes very exclusive stationary. Type is very crisp and sharp. The process is capable of extremely fine detail and as a result is used to print security microtype. Halftones are usually created with line effects rather than a conventional halftone screen. Softly passing one’s fingers over the printed work will reveal a tangible texture due to the raised ink.


Thermography

Thermography is commonly used on wedding invitations, letterheads, business cards, and greetings cards as an attractive alternative to the more expensive engraving process. Type has a raised surface texture similar to engraving however, with thermography type appears to be printed under a transparent coating. The low resolution of this process makes it unsuitable for quality halftone screening.

.


LCD display (print to screen – just for fun)

The letter “e” as displayed black against a white background on my laptop’s display. Since the LCD display produces no light of its own, it requires a cold cathode fluorescent lamp situated behind the LCD panel. Electronically-modulated pixels filled with liquid crystals are arrayed in front of the light source to produce images in color. Passing the backlight through the red, green, and blue liquid crystals recreates the backlight white, while blocking the backlight creates black. Anti-aliasing of the letter helps to smooth the shape of the letter form and compensates for the relatively low resolution of the screen itself. Note that the pixels forming the image are not square but rectangles

.

QR in action: Scannable Valentine’s Day Stamps Say “XOXO” in QR

Tuesday, February 22nd, 2011

By Patrick Henry, at What They Think, on February 11th, 2011

Nobody ever called QR codes pretty to look at. But then, nobody has taken QR codes to heart in quite the same way as Chunghwa Post, the postal system of the Republic of China (Taiwan). For Valentine’s Day, the agency has turned the stark black-and-white of these print-leveraging symbols into a palette of pastels with an underlying message of love—a sentiment that’s welcome in the mailbox on any day of the year.

According to Chunghwa Post, young people in Taiwan now widely celebrate the western tradition of Valentine’s Day on February 14. Hoping to attract the younger generation to stamp collecting as well as to encourage letter-writing, Chunghwa Post has released another set of two Valentine’s Day stamps to coincide with the observance in 2011. (The first in this series of stamp sets was issued on February 6, 2007.)

The design of the stamp features a heart formed by a row of perforations, as well as images of roses, presents, hearts, and the word “LOVE” created from pixels. “Through the interaction between the sender and the receiver,” says the postal service, “these stamps convey love and heighten the romantic atmosphere of Valentine’s Day.”

When scanned by a smartphone with software capable of reading QR codes, the NT$5 stamp reveals the message “Happy Valentine’s Day.” The NT$25 stamp says “I Love You” once decoded. According to this blog, some of the stamps will carry special messages, others will have images, and others can be customized to include short videos to loved ones.

The stamps are designed by Jigsaw Puzzle Design Company and offset printed by China Color Printing Co., Ltd. Lovers (and philatelists) can order them from Chunghwa Posthere.

In the US, 19% of companies feel that stand-alone direct mail generates the most business

Friday, February 18th, 2011

From Print In The Mix:

February 1, 2010 — Pitney Bowes surveyed 4,000 B2B marketers — divided equally throughout the US, UK, France, and Germany – to uncover current B2B thinking regarding marketing channel choice and business communications in today’s complex and challenging communication environment.

The survey finds:

  • An average of 50% of B2B companies in the US and 53% across the UK, France and Germany (EU) report it increasingly difficult to reach and influence customers as a result of media fragmentation.
  • Examining stand-alone and multichannel B2B marketing efforts for generating business:
  • Direct mail comes out as the top stand-alone channel.
  • In the US, 19% of companies feel that stand-alone direct mail generates the most business for them.  In the EU, 12% of companies report this.

  • In comparison to stand-alone direct mail, 10% of US companies favor solo e-mail campaigns
  • (8% EU) and 7% rely on stand-alone search engine marketing (6% EU).

  • In contrast, more respondents favor integrated marketing as the best approach: 30% of US firms cited a combination of mail, email and web campaigns as generating the most business for them (27% EU).
  • B2B marketers recognize the enhanced effectiveness of combining traditional and digital channels — 58% of US firms and 53% of EU firms feel that concentrating solely on electronic media would seriously damage their ability to generate leads.

About:  4,000 B2B decision makers surveyed (1,000  in the US, UK, France, Germany).  Respondents balanced by company size, location.  Survey conducted online, 2010.

Source:  WhatTheyThink, Pitney Bowes launches free white paper series, February 1, 2010.

For Direct Mail, Don’t Forget About the Fold

Wednesday, February 16th, 2011

From the Digital Nirvana this morning:

By Trish Witkowski on February 16th, 2011:

By leveraging current technology, marketers can use print as a way to create a dialogue in B2C communications. Send an email, then a targeted print piece with a PURL, a microsite or QR code to increase points of contact and gather more information about the customer’s interests. In doing this, they’re saying goodbye to the old-school “spray and pray” direct mail methodology and choosing to spend more on the piece to ensure its visibility and return on investment. So what does folding have to do with it? Successful direct mail involves the alignment of several variables, and choice of folding style is one of these variables, however so is color palette, text and imagery, paper choice, layout, format and even schedule. Below is a list of questions addressing machinability for direct mail. I’ll be posting in the future about envelope choice, tips, tricks and techniques to help you get the most out of your DM investment.


Is one fold better than another at getting the most into a standard letter envelope?

Not really. There are always different configurations for folding paper that can get a very large amount of information into a compact size. When designing for folded materials, what is most important is to focus on the organization and reveal of the content so that it does not confuse the recipient, and the placement of critical marketing messages. I always suggest that you mock up your layout and hand it to a few people to make sure the message is properly communicated. If your small test group doesn’t get it, your mailing audience won’t get it, either, and you should rework your layout and test again.

What are the most effective machinable folds for direct mail?

The key to successful machine production for direct mail is closed edges. Perfect example – the accordion fold is notoriously problematic for both self-mailing and for auto-inserting. The trouble is caused by the format—accordions don’t have a closed edge. The open sides make it very difficult, if not impossible, to auto insert, and if it’s self-mailing it’ll need four tabs to seal both sides. Expensive and unattractive. However, if you choose a wrapped accordion (see illustration), you get the accordion experience you’re looking for with its pull-out panels, but you also get a closed edge, which changes the tab requirement and offers a closed edge for inserting. So, sometimes you can get what you want with a little creativity.

How important is machinability for direct mail?

I’ll answer a question with a question: How important is it that you don’t throw money away? I see it all the time—a really great design built in a format that instantly adds a .20 per piece non-machinable surcharge to the mailing budget. Why???? I have samples in my collection that miss USPS aspect ratio by 1/8 inch. It’s silly. What a mindless and costly mistake. In my opinion, there are two things to consider when talking about machine production—machinability of the fold and machinability for mailing. Unless you don’t care at all about the budget, ideally, you should aim for a maximum of one of the two options, but never both. For example, if you’re printing a fairly short run, you may choose a unique folding style that has to be hand folded, but you should try to produce it in a format that is within USPS aspect ratio. Or, similar scenario, design a machinable fold in a square format if you must, however, your most efficient solution will always be machinable fold in a machinable mail format.

Editors Note:  You can find more ideas from Trish at the foldfactory 3-D sample library and watch short videos of hundreds of folding ideas that will be sure to add some variety to the everyday.


Direct Mail ROI: Every Dollar Spent Generates $12.57 In Sales

Wednesday, February 9th, 2011

from Print in the Mix:

According to the Direct Marketing Association (DMA), in 2010 every dollar spent on direct marketing advertising resulted in $12.57 in direct marketing-driven sales, on average.


ROI: Summary of DM-Driven Sales Per $1 of DM Advertising
Return by Medium 2004 2008 2009 2010 2014
Direct Mail $12.33 $12.55 $12.53 $12.57 $12.61
Direct Mail (Non-Catalog) $15.59 $15.52 $15.22 $15.28 $15.48
Direct Mail (Catalog) $7.06 $7.28 $7.32 $7.34 $7.27
Telephone Marketing $8.49 $8.57 $8.48 $8.42 $8.29
Internet (Non E-Mail) $25.93 $19.88 $19.83 $19.86 $19.77
Internet Display $25.53 $19.78 $19.57 $19.57 $19.21
Internet Search $27.60 $21.84 $21.85 $21.90 $21.93
Social Networking NA $12.57 $12.39 $12.45 $13.02
Internet Other $17.59 $16.62 $16.48 $16.75 $17.03
Commercial E-Mail $58.01 $44.93 $43.62 $42.08 $36.70
DR Newspaper $13.26 $12.77 $12.46 $12.26 $11.89
DR TV $7.02 $6.81 $6.63 $6.62 $6.48
DR Magazine $10.30 $10.11 $10.27 $10.26 $10.06
DR Radio $8.66 $8.60 $8.29 $8.28 $8.09
Insert Media $11.76 $11.60 $11.45 $11.43 $11.35
Other* $6.93 $7.01 $6.89 $6.91 $6.87
*Other includes all other trackable DM delivered media including outdoor, facsimiles, podcasting, displays, and kiosks.
Source:  The Direct Marketing Association (DMA), The Power of Direct Marketing, 2009-2010

What Are You Doing to Compete with Email?

Tuesday, February 8th, 2011

Saw this article this morning at Digital Nirvana and I thought that it raised some great points -

By Heidi Tolliver-Nigro on February 8th, 2011

There has been a lot of chatter about email vs. direct mail lately, and for good reason. Email is cheap. Email provides instant gratification. Email campaigns can be deployed at the push of a button.

It is no wonder that marketers love email. In fact, according to StrongMail’s 2011 Marketing Trends Report, 65% of businesses are planning to increase their spend on email marketing this year compared to 18% that are planning to increase their spend on direct mail.

So here’s the question. Next time one of your clients tells you they are cutting back on print in favor of email, what are you going to say? (Or do you simply watch  their print volumes disappear without asking any questions?) Do you have a response prepared?

If not, here are a few thoughts you might want to have at the ready:

  • Email has a high value for communicating with existing customers, but for prospecting, nothing beats direct mail.
  • Email lists are notoriously unreliable. They cannot be checked beforehand, so their quality only becomes known after you’ve pushed “send.”
  • Email lists go out of date quickly. People change addresses at the drop of a hat.
  • People have multiple email addresses (even dummy addresses to avoid marketers like you), but they typically only have one home.
  • Many people use their work email as their primary address; consequently, your communication faces the relentless, often over-zealous corporate spam filter.
  • Consumers’ home addresses don’t have a spam filter.
  • Email generates immediate response, but print has a longer shelf life. Recipients often respond to direct mail weeks or even months after it arrives in their home.
  • Print has a gravitas that email does not. This makes it preferred for financial, medical, and other communications of a more serious and confidential nature.
  • You have to touch direct mail in order to “delete” it.

Email has many benefits. So does direct mail. One is not necessarily better than another. Marketers simply need to understand their value and use them in symbiosis, not in competition. But they may not think of that on their own. When you find out they’ve shrunk their print budget in favor of email, will you stand there dumbfounded? Or will you have a response ready?